Paulanity is From Devil: Some Facts About Christianity

Ed Decker is a Christian apologist. According to Dick Baer, he wants to sensationalize and shock people. Previously he has attracted people by criticising Mormonism. Now he is criticising, rather vilifying Islam through his biased writings. Recently he has published a book whose very name is blasphemous. Through this blog I want to convey to Decker and others like him, that before criticising Islam, they must first critically analyze Christianity.
  • Jesus Christ (Peace be upon him) never claimed that he is the founder of a new religion: Christianity. Even he never uttered the word Christianity in his whole lifetime.
  • It was Paul, a self-claimed apostle of Christ (Peace be upon him) who was the founder of Christianity. (Reference).
  • Gospels indicate that Christ (Peace be upon him) always kept himself under the Divine Laws of Moses (Peace be upon him). He announced that he had not come even to change an iota of the Law revealed to Moses (Peace be upon him). (Mathew 24:35)
  • Though Christ (Peace be upon him) used the words “Son of God” for himself, but this phrase is extensively used in Bible for pious believers. (Reference).
    • "Saint" Paul: Self claimed apostle of
    Christ (PBUH)
  • In Bible there is no evidence that God told human beings that Christ (Peace be upon him) was died on cross. Either it is mentioned as the observation of the people present there, or it is the insistence of Paul. Paul claimed that he was an apostle of Christ (Peace be upon him). Though Bible is devoid of this. Christ (Peace be upon him) never appointed him as his apostle. Paul proved that he was actually “the Apostle of Devil”.
  • Old Testament and Gospels are free of any concept of Trinity. Trinity was something whose groundwork was prepared by Paul.
  • It was Paul who put forward the idea that Christ (Peace be upon him) was divine Son of God, and thus God himself. He insisted that he died on cross. This idea was a great triumph of Satan. Today, Every Christian believes that his God, Christ was died on cross. What else could be a greater victory of Satan?
  • Another victory of devil is that instead of considering the cross as unholy it is considered holy in Christianity. Naturally cross must be considered unholy as the God of Christians was died on it.
  • Bible tells us of a story of a conflict between Paul, the Apostle of Satan and Peter (May God be pleased with him), the true Apostle of Jesus Christ. (Reference). There were also conflicts between Barnabas (May God be pleased with him) and Paul. These historical facts also show that what were the real intentions of Paul.
    • Cross: According to Christians, it
    is the instrument by which his
    enemies killed Christ (PBUH),
    whom they believe to be their god.
    Instead of considering it unholy,
    Christians consider it to be
    holy!
  • Paul was introducing new heretic doctrines to the teachings of Christ (Peace be upon him). This resulted in disapproval from the followers of Christ (PBUH). That is why Paul was summoned to explain his heretic doctrines. (Reference).
  • It was Paul who preached not to follow the Laws revealed to Moses (PBUH). According to Paul following the Laws of Moses was foolishness. (Gal.3:3. Also click here for detail). Wasn’t it a victory of Devil?
  • Paul made grounds of Trinity. Trinity is none but polytheism. Old Testament is devoid of Trinity. Gospels are devoid of Trinity. But Paul introduced such ideas which resulted in Trinity. Trinity can be summed up as following:
          * God is one.
          * The Father is God.
          * The Holy Spirit is God.
          * The Son (Christ) is God.
          * The Father, the Holy Spirit and the Son are not same and one.

         What else is polytheism? Isn’t Trinity a victory of Satan?

Other related posts:
Ridiculous Claims of Some Christians Regarding Word “Allah” (1)
Ridiculous Claims of Some Christians Regarding Word “Allah” (2)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Summary of Ramayana in Urdu (رامائن کا اردو خلاصہ)

Image
In Pakistan two inflows of history merge with each other. One is religious, having origin from Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem. It gives a universal spiritual message for whole humanity. We own it very deeply. The other one is that of the history and culture of our land. We live in Muslim India, which we named Pakistan. This land has a history, along with its culture and traditions, other than that of Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem. There is no reason to not own this culture and tradition, as far as it does not contradict with our religious teachings. Some (perhaps all) foolish policymakers of Pakistan want to remove our bonds with our secular history. They believe it is good for Pakistan. But weakening of our links with our secular history cannot serve us in achieving our religious goals. This summary of the story of a praiseworthy son of the land, Rama, is translated in Urdu as an effort to revive our links with our secular history. دسرتھ اجودھیا کا راجا تھا۔ بد قسمتی سے راجا ب
Read more

Amar Shonar Bangla: An Urdu Translation

Image
"Amar Shonar Bangla" is a marvellous song written by Tagore in 1906, when the British government divided Bengal in two parts, as per their policy of "divide and rule". Its first ten lines were adopted as the national anthem of Bangladesh. It is one of the most beautiful songs written in the love of one's fatherland. This beautiful song is presented here, along with its Urdu translation. English translation (by Syed Ali Ahsan) and transliteration are also given۔ English Transliteration English Translation Urdu translation (منثور اردو ترجمہ) Amar shonar Bangla, Ami tomae bhalobashi. My Bengal of Gold, I love you. میرے سنہرےبنگال میں تیرے پیارمیں ڈوبا ہواہوں Chirodin tomar akash, Tomar batash, Amar prane bajae bãshi. Forever your skies, Your air set my heart in tune As if it were a flute. تیراآکاش، تیری ہوائیں جب بھی میرے دل کو چھوتی ہیں تو یہ بانسری کی طرح نغمےالاپنے لگتاہے O ma, Phagune tor amer bone Ghrane pagol kôre, Mori h
Read more

(حضور کرشن جی مہاراج) A Brief Biography of Krishna

Image
A Brief Biography in Urdu In Pakistan two inflows of history merge with each other. One is religious, having origin from Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem. It gives a universal spiritual message for whole humanity. We own it very deeply. The other one is that of the history and culture of our land. We live in Muslim India, which we named Pakistan. This land has a history, along with its culture and traditions, other than that of Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem. There is no reason to not own this culture and tradition, as far as it does not contradict with our religious teachings. Some (perhaps all) foolish policymakers of Pakistan want to remove our bonds with our secular history. They believe it is good for Pakistan. But weakening of our links with our secular history cannot serve us in achieving our religious goals. This is a brief biography of a praiseworthy son of the land, Krishna, translated in Urdu as an effort to revive our links with our secular history. حضور کرشن جی مہاراج ان شخ
Read more